Portugal did not uphold the EU’s decision to deny the Belarussian president a visa
On November 19th, the session of foreign ministers of the European Union denied a visa for the president of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko. Neither Lukashenko, nor seven Belarussian ministers were allowed to gain access to the EU. The capital of Portugal, Lisbon became a saving straw for the senior officials of Belarus.
Portugal decided to block the decision, which was upheld by 14 other countries. Lisbon agreed to receive Belarussian officials on its territory. In addition, if Lukashenko and his ministers wish to go to Portugal, they will be granted national Portuguese visas, not Shengen visas.
Portugal chairs the OSCE currently. The government of this country does not exclude that EU’s decision against Belarus will prevent a session of OSCE ministers in Porto. The session is to take place on December 6-7.
Times of News Online wrote that Portugal’s special position is connected with the fact that Lisbon will soon hold the summit between the European Union and Africa. It was added that anti-Belarussian sanctions might provoke such actions against several African leaders.
The government of Portugal believes that the precedent with Alexander Lukashenko might lead to more such incidents as far as African politics is concerned. For instance, the European Union might institute such sanctions against the authoritarian President of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe. The new Portuguese government believes that such measures will hinder the solutions to problems, which lead to the isolation of such countries as Belarus.
This means that Portugal chairs the OSCE for a reason. This country will be the venue for the African-European summit, which is not incidental either. Unfortunately, not all European countries listen to progressive tendencies that come from Portugal now. This is probably because of the fact that Portugal does not currently enjoy the political influence that it used to have.
The Russian State Duma refused to add two draft resolutions onto its agenda today. The documents were offered from LDPR faction (Liberal and Democratic Party of Russia) deputy Aleskey Mitrofanov. One of the documents contained an address from the lower house of the Russian parliament to the government of the Czech republic. The address is connected with the refusal to grant a visa to the president of Belarus.
As Mitrofanov said, the demarche of the Czech authorities was an unprecedented incident to happen against the Unified State of Russia and Belarus. Mitrofanov is certain that there should be adequate measures taken in return. State Duma Speaker Gennady Seleznyov pointed out that all official statements had been made. He recommended Mitrofanov to withhold his comments on the subject. As a result, Mitrofanov’s initiative was supported by 148 deputies, whereas the needed number of votes was 226.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has recently had a phone conversation with Belarussian President Alexander Lukashenko. The presidents decided to hold a top meeting in Moscow, around November 27th. According to the information from the press service of the Belarussian president, the leaders of the two countries will discuss the issues, which caused wild reactions in the society.
RIA Novosti has recently reported that over 270 citizens of various countries that wanted to come for the NATO summit in Prague could not enter the territory of the Czech republic. The vast majority of those people were denied visas on account of their inclusion on the list of “undesirable people.” The black list reportedly counts more than two thousand people. RTR-Vesti.Ry photograph
Sergey Yugov PRAVDA.Ru
Translated by Dmitry Sudakov
Putin's official spokesman Dmitry Peskov commented on remarks in the US media about failures in launching nuclear-capable missiles in Russia
More than 5.8 million people voted for Nicholas Maduro at the presidential election in Venezuela. This is more than a quarter of registered voters. Why did those people vote for the man, who, as Western media write, took Venezuela to the brink of collapse?
It has long been understood that the West has been trying to subject Russian borders to total control. We have not seen such activity even during the Cold War