Source Pravda.Ru

First-born Children Have Better Chances for Presidency

First-born children are always more successful in life as compared with their junior brothers and sisters. They usually treat more seriously everything they do, choice of a profession or a job; consequently they achieve higher success at that. Middle brothers and sisters are as a rule more sociable, they feel good in merry companies of friends. Junior children in families are manipulators who usually exert influence upon other people to get whatever they want.

This is a classification given in the book Why the First-borns Rule the World by Australian psychologist Michael Grose.

To prove his words the author cites facts that are known to everybody. He says that all American cosmonauts were first-born children in their families. The same could be said about many political leaders such as Winston Churchill, Saddam Hussein, Joseph Stalin, Bill Clinton and George Bush. But such famous figures as Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair and George Bush the father mismatch the rule; they succeeded better than their elder brothers and sisters. So, such exceptions do prove the rule.

Michael Grose insists that each baby in a family requires an individual approach. He says that first-born children need support that they need to carry out their plans. Middle brothers and sisters always need to be reminded that their opinions are also very important for decision making; otherwise children in the middle will treat things that happen around them too thoughtlessly. As for junior children, they need constant attention; what is more, it is not good to constantly tell them that other brothers and sisters are older. Otherwise they would like to play the role of "little and offended children" to get whatever they want.

Gala.net

My article The True Judas discussed the theory that Judas's actions in betraying Jesus were motivated by a misunderstanding of Christ's mission and purpose.

America's judases, part two: Gladys Knight

The United Kingdom stands fatally divided between nations, regions, generations, on the edge of a critical fault line which threatens the future of the Union.

Brexit: UK caught between the past and the future

The United Kingdom stands fatally divided between nations, regions, generations, on the edge of a critical fault line which threatens the future of the Union.

Brexit: UK caught between the past and the future
Comments
Homosexuality and the Decline in American Values
Russian bomber crashes in Novgorod region
America's judases, part two: Gladys Knight
WaPo's Distorted Year in Review
Brexit: UK caught between the past and the future
Two Su-34 fighters touch wings in midair and crash into the sea in Russia's Far East
Dumped by the Trump that Americans Deserved
The Russians will soon wake up to lose two Kuril Islands to Japan
The Russians will soon wake up to lose two Kuril Islands to Japan
The scandal of skewed reporting
The scandal of skewed reporting
US Economic War on China
Russia's 2018: Confidence in Putin gone
Brexit: UK caught between the past and the future
Russian Foreign Ministry on Syria, Ukraine, and Phony US Election Meddling
Russian Foreign Ministry on Syria, Ukraine, and Phony US Election Meddling
Russian Foreign Ministry on Syria, Ukraine, and Phony US Election Meddling
Russian Foreign Ministry on Syria, Ukraine, and Phony US Election Meddling
Russian Foreign Ministry on Syria, Ukraine, and Phony US Election Meddling
Russia's Status-6 'doomsday weapon' nullifies all of American military projects
Russian 9-year-old boy sets new record for Guinness Book