So his absence this week from the first of four playoff events in the FedEx Cup should have come as no surprise.
Nor should it be a problem.
Once the inaugural "PGA Tour Playoffs" head toward a conclusion, no one will remember that Woods skipped The Barclays. Even if he doesn't win the FedEx Cup, odds are he'll be in the running. And that beats any interest in the United States that golf used to have in the autumn, stacked against the NFL and Major League Baseball playoffs.
Truth is, Woods might have done the tour a favor.
Considering how he has been playing lately (two straight victories), and how he finished last season (six straight U.S. PGA Tour victories), it was conceivable the world's No. 1 player could have wrapped up the FedEx Cup and gone home before the U.S. Tour Championship.
Woods, of course, cares more about himself than an organization he could have supported by showing up in New York.
Nothing wrong with that, either.
The tour is bringing a team concept to golf with these playoffs, but it's still an individual sport.
Tour commissioner Tim Finchem must have come to the same conclusion last weekend during the final round of the Wyndham Championship, the last tournament to qualify for the playoffs. Yes, he was disappointed that Woods decided not to play The Barclays, especially after the tour was banking on all the stars playing in the final four weeks of the FedEx Cup.
"On the other hand," Finchem said, "I can't second-guess Tiger about what he thinks he has to do to win."
History shows that Woods plays his best golf when he paces himself, just as Jack Nicklaus did before him.
The best example might have been in 1996, when he played four straight weeks while trying to earn enough money to get his tour card. With a job secured and his energy drained, Woods unceremoniously pulled out of the Buick Challenge, then won two of his next three starts to qualify for the U.S. Tour Championship.
The most he has ever played in a row on the U.S. PGA Tour was five weeks in early 1999. His lone victory during that stretch came at the Buick Invitational, where he flirted with missing the cut before a 62-65 weekend.
Of his 59 tour victories, Woods has won only 10 times while playing his third consecutive week.
He has a formula, and it seems to work.
Contrast that with Brandt Snedeker, who won the Wyndham Championship to improve his seeding in the playoffs from No. 32 to No. 9. The tour rookie also played in the U.S. PGA Championship, so he could finish the season playing six straight weeks.
"Some guys play their best golf after weeks off. That's just the way it is," Snedeker said. "Everybody is different. I seem to play my best golf when I go on stretches like this where I play a lot on the road for some reason."
K.J. Choi once closed the 2000 season by playing six straight weeks. He missed the cut five straight times before a tie for 29th in the Southern Farm Bureau Classic.
"By the fifth week, I was so worn out," Choi said. "All my shots were weak and I had no energy."
If there's a problem with the FedEx Cup, it might be asking players to cram so much golf into such a short stretch. Golf is more about quality starts than endurance, which is why so many players set their schedules accordingly.
Woods is among those who can get away with it.
Most players try to peak for the four biggest events of the year, which are spread over five months, not four weeks.
Woods said in his monthly newsletter this week he supports the FedEx Cup playoffs.
"I need a little break to get ready for the final three events because I think it gives me the best chance to challenge for the title," he said. "Plus, I want to be sharp for the Presidents Cup (in) the last week in September."
The tour doesn't need Woods at Westchester for its playoffs to be a success. He will be at Boston, Chicago and Atlanta, joined by Phil Mickelson, Vijay Singh, Jim Furyk, Ernie Els and the rest of golf's biggest names.
The only time so many stars have gotten together this late in the year was at the Ryder Cup or Presidents Cup.
That alone is a victory for the U.S. PGA Tour.
The co-author of this disaster is the Dutch government, which did not find either strength or desire to save the lives of its citizens who were flying on that plane. The Dutch authorities did not demand Ukraine to comply with international aviation regulations