Source Pravda.Ru

NATO to turn missile defences against Russia?

A number of Western experts have been polled on the nuclear confrontation between Russia and the NATO.

Frank Rose, assistant secretary of state, claims that "the size and sophistication of Russia's strategic missile force" outweighs the US and NATO defense interceptors otherwise "available to defend against such a large force."

Previously the Western politicians have been concerned over Putin's statement, that Russia possesses 40 new ICBMs, able to "overcome even the most technically advanced anti-missile defense systems."

The Western leaders immediateky announced that the missile defense system in Europe is aimed not at Russia, but Iran.

NATO's missile defense systems, rolled out in 2010, "were designed to protect against a limited threat like Iran, not a threat like Russia," according to Friedrich Wilhelm Ploeger, who until recently served as deputy commander of NATO's Allied Air Command.

The systems comprise missile defense radars in Turkey, Aegis missile defense ships in the Mediterranean and forthcoming Aegis ashore sites in Poland and Romania, to be completed in 2018.

But while the telemetry of NATO's focus has changed from Iran to Russia since the alliance broke ground on its missile defense infrastructure in 2010, "the geography didn't change," according to Heather Conley, director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies' Europe Program.

Even if the missile defense systems could be fully repostured to face Russia, Rose cautioned that "we need to be very realistic about the technical capabilities of our missile defense systems."

Additionally, Rose conceded that "there is no political consensus in the alliance" to enact such a change. And with an Iran nuclear deal still in flux, the opportunity cost of focusing missile defense to the East could mean leaving NATO's southern flank exposed.

Mustafa Kibaroglu, chair of the Political Science and International Relations Department at MEF University in Istanbul, believes that we shouldn't exacerbate relations with Russia, as "we need Russia when we deal with Iran, we need Russia when we deal with North Korea, and we need Russia when we deal with the Islamic State."

Also read: USA to deploy missile defense system in Ukraine

Pravda.Ru

Read article in Russian on the Russian version of Pravda.Ru

Read more on the subject here

 

"We have every right to impose sharia here in Belgium...We say that we want to impose sharia, because Sharia is 80% compatible with the Constitution"

The Islamic party challenges Europe

An objective analysis of where the United Kingdom and its Prime Minister stand one hundred days before the Brexit deadline. Let us see the facts, not conjecture

May's Mayhem: Where the UK Prime Minister has it wrong

"We have every right to impose sharia here in Belgium...We say that we want to impose sharia, because Sharia is 80% compatible with the Constitution"

The Islamic party challenges Europe