Source Pravda.Ru

New law bans partial abortion

The new federal law banning a procedure that the government calls partial-birth abortion compromises reproductive choice for women, and is vague and unconstitutional, a lawyer argued yesterday in Federal District Court in New York, echoing statements made in California and Nebraska as challenges to the law went to trial across the country. In defense of the law, the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, Bush administration lawyers said the procedure was never medically necessary to protect a woman's health and caused undue pain to the fetus, making the procedure inhumane.

The two sides squared off in federal courts over suits brought by doctors and abortion rights groups against the act, which President Bush signed into law in November. In pretrial hearings, the cases drew considerable national attention as the government tried to subpoena medical records of abortions from hospitals. In all three lawsuits release of those records have been temporarily prohibited, either by appellate courts or a district judge.

At issue is the ban that criminalizes a procedure called intact dilation and extraction, which can be used to terminate pregnancies after the first trimester. Any "overt act" to "kill the partially delivered living fetus" is banned, punishable by up to two years in prison, report nytimes.com

Monday in U.S. District Court in New York, echoing statements made in California and Nebraska as challenges to the law went to trial across the country.

In defense of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, lawyers for the Bush administration said the procedure was never medically necessary to protect a woman's health and caused undue pain to the fetus, making the procedure inhumane.

The two sides squared off in federal courts over lawsuits brought by doctors and abortion-rights groups against the act, which the president signed into law in November, dailynews.com

The ban fails to consider a woman's health, which the U.S. Supreme Court already ruled unconstitutional when it considered a similar Nebraska law in 2000. Worse, politicians are inserting themselves into what should be a private decision made by a woman in consultation with her doctor.

The procedure is most often used when a woman in her second trimester confronts tragic and unforeseen circumstances. The American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists both oppose the ban.

Congress seems intent on keeping the abortion issue on the field as a political football. The courts should let them know that this particular game is over, according to mercurynews.com

Comments
Israel vows to destroy Russia's S-300 in Syria in case of danger
World War Three is near? The West wants to bypass Russia's veto at UN Security Council
World War Three is near? The West wants to bypass Russia's veto at UN Security Council
World War Three is near? The West wants to bypass Russia's veto at UN Security Council
Silk Road To Germany: New Molotov-Ribbentrop-Mao Pact
Russia's S-300 systems against Tomahawk missiles flying towards Syria
World War Three is near? The West wants to bypass Russia's veto at UN Security Council
World War Three is near? The West wants to bypass Russia's veto at UN Security Council
Putin must sue UK because of Skripal case lies
Israel vows to destroy Russia's S-300 in Syria in case of danger
Silk Road To Germany: New Molotov-Ribbentrop-Mao Pact
Silk Road To Germany: New Molotov-Ribbentrop-Mao Pact
Armenia's velvet revolution: Sold
Israel vows to destroy Russia's S-300 in Syria in case of danger
Russia to deliver S-300 air defence systems to Syria for free
Silk Road To Germany: New Molotov-Ribbentrop-Mao Pact
Horror chambers in Douma
Israel vows to destroy Russia's S-300 in Syria in case of danger
Israel vows to destroy Russia's S-300 in Syria in case of danger
America always thirsty for more blood that even children can shed
America always thirsty for more blood that even children can shed