On February 9, 2009, a New Jersey attorney, Mr. Mario Apuzzo, filed a lawsuit on behalf of Plaintiffs, Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James LeNormand and Donald H. Nelson, Jr.
The lawsuit, Civil Action Number. 1:09 –cv-00253 was filed in United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
You can see the actual case filing at Mr. Apuzzo’s website.
The defendants in this case are: Barrack Hussein Obama II, and Individually, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, United States of America, The United States Congress, The United States Senate, The United States House of Representatives, Richard B. Cheney (President of the US Senate, Presiding Officer of Joint Session of Congress, Vice President of the United States and Individually), Nancy Pelosi (Speaker of the House and Individually).
All of the defendants have been served with a copy of the complaint and have 60 days to respond to the complaint. Will they stand up like honest citizens and answer the complaint, or will they hide behind high priced lawyers like Obama has been doing?
Basically, the lawsuit says there is no verifiable proof that Obama is an American citizen and is therefore ineligible to be the President of the United States. It also points out that the United States Code of Federal Regulations was violated by the defendants, during the course of counting Electoral votes, by not asking any members of Congress if they objected to the counts. A normal counting of the votes takes approximately 2 hours. Obama’s took 36 minutes and it is on record that there was no call for any objections.
This lawsuit is important because, the cold hard fact of life is that if Obama is not qualified or eligible to be the President of the United States of America, every action Obama takes is fraudulent. Any Treaty, Executive Order, Agreements, and/or Laws signed by him are not valid and can be rescinded, reneged on or totally ignored by any Nation on Earth, including future American administrations, now and into the distant future. Any trade agreements between Nations and Corporations can be denied or rescinded.
By the very nature of Obama’s citizenship being questioned, it places the liberty of all Americans in jeopardy. Obama himself, can end all lawsuits, quiet all questions, stop all Internet chatter about his citizenship by simply producing a legitimate Birth Certificate. What reason could he have for employing legal firms to obstruct anyone from seeing where he was born?
An ineligible President makes the entire World a very dangerous place and places every Nation in an unprecedented, unstable position in regards to dealing with America.
By taking his stance Mario Apuzzo and his Plaintiffs are protecting the World in their efforts to protect Americans.
If American politicians refuse to follow the one important rule of the US Constitution in choosing a President, the most important position in America, they can and will ignore any part of the Constitution and any law as it fits their needs. This is described as “Anarchy”.
Not a single World leader can trust our politicians or our agreements.
Mario Apuzzo and his four Plaintiffs are not alone in their quest to find out if Obama is an American citizen.
Obama has used three law firms to keep his birth place secret. There is no proof that he was born in America. Obama steadfastly refuses to provide any proof that he is an American citizen. Most of us have heard of his “Certification of Live Birth” in Hawaii. Any person born in any location on Earth can have the State of Hawaii give them a “Certification of Live Birth”. This document has a space on it asking what country the applicant was born in. Hawaii has two birth documents. 1. A “Certification” which is given to anyone who asks for it, regardless of what country they were born in. 2. A “Certificate” which is only given to people born in Hawaii.
Obama and the major news companies in America proudly show an ignorant populace the “Certification”. It proves only that a human being was born somewhere on this particular Planet.
Another attorney, Dr. Orly Taitz of California, has been tenacious in trying to force Obama to prove he is an American. Dr. Taitz has a website that will keep you up to date on her activities.
One of the problems these lawsuits face is the simple task of getting a Judge to at least consider the facts presented. Case after case has been thrown out by various Judges, loosely based on the incredibly profound ruling of “It’s none of your business who is President, so shut up.”
Dr. Orly Taitz has two lawsuits sitting in the US Supreme Court. There have been questions as to whether the US Supreme Court Justices have even been made aware of her filings in their Court. It is very possible that not one of the nine Justices knows about the controversy regarding an illegal alien pretending to be our President while he his partying his butt off in the White House.
When US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was performing a book signing for his new book, Dr. Taitz bought two copies, stood in line with everyone else and when it was her turn to have her book signed, she introduced herself, explained a bit about the cases and gave him a copy of the 130 page dossier/letter sent to Eric Holder, US Attorney General and others asking them to investigate Obama for:
Cyberspace crimes, impersonation of a military officer; identity theft of U.S. Army Officer Scott Easterling, libel, defamation of character, intimidation, harassment, interference with judicial proceedings, breaking into the computer system of the Supreme Court of the United States, voter fraud, using cyberspace for voter fraud, fraud, forgery, and other related crimes.
Justice Scalia appeared not to be aware of the lawsuits filed in his Court, which is not unusual, as they receive thousands of cases each year and only review a small number of them.
Justice Scalia said that he would look into the matter and he would read her dossier.
She also sent copies of that dossier to: Steven Whitlock-Director of Whistle Blower Office-IRS, Director of FBI-Robert Mueller, Congressional Judiciary Committee, Senatorial Judiciary Committee, Illinois Attorney General, Texas Attorney General, Tennessee Attorney General, California Attorney General.
Electronic copies were sent to: US Senate, US Congress, Various State Governors and to Domestic and International Major Media. America’s major media has been advised many times of the question of Obama’s birth and all they respond with is the phony “Certification of Live
Birth”. Eventually a lawsuit may be filed against the major media owners who have helped to perpetrate this ongoing fraud.
This 130 page dossier contained numerous charges including: a list of 100 addresses for Barack Obama with numerous different social security numbers, issued all over the country and attached to those addresses. It showed the address Obama used in Somerville, Massachusetts, attached to the Social Security number of a man who is 118 years old. It showed evidence of Obama committing perjury, lying under oath. It had his school registration from Indonesia under the name Barry Soetoro, citizen of Indonesia, religion Muslim. There was a page of Obama’s registration to become an attorney and officer of the court in Illinois, where he stated under oath that his name is Barack Hussein Obama and he had no other prior names, which is on record as being untrue. It contained a report from a federal agent, Steven Coffman, stating that there are numerous signs of forgery in his Selective Service Certificate. It contained a letter from a renowned expert, Sandra Line, stating that there are signs of forgery in Obama’s short version Certification of Live Birth, and that the original birth certificate needs to be reviewed in order to ascertain his status. It contained 130 current job positions for Barry Obama, Barack H. Obama and Michelle Obama, which were obtained from Intellius Jobs.com. It stated that none of them were reported on Obama’s tax returns. This dossier can be found here.
To be continued...
The Sukhoi Su-57 has a number of advantages over previous aircraft models. It is barely noticeable on radar screens
The historical experience to date has shown that identity politics have always served the interests of those who exploit such identities, not those who carry them