Does anyone trust NATO? After the lies about Saddam Hussein's Weapons of Mass Destruction, after the lies about Serbs mistreating Kosovar Albanians, now we have claims that Muammar Al-Gaddafi is using cluster bombs against the Islamist terrorists aided and abetted by the USA, UK and France.
The Libyan government denies this claim as being lies and western propaganda. Where is the truth? After a close examination of the facts, let us see who to believe.
The Libyan "civilians" attacked by "Gaddafi" are exactly what? Foreign mercenaries and heavily armed Islamist fundamentalists trained, aided, abetted and financed by Washington and its sickening clique of poodle-states for many years. The campaign started with a massacre of civilians, not by the forces of "Gaddafi" but by the Benghazi-based terrorists, who slit the throats of hundreds of supporters of the Brotherly Leader of Libya.
Obviously, there was an act of retaliation by the authorities to impose law and order. What do the authorities do when there is an armed insurrection? Especially since this has happened before, in Benghazi, in the mid-1990s. From the same Islamist fanatics, who Colonel Al-Qathafi calls "the bearded ones", those who hate him because he has spoken out against the stoning of women and the death of «homosexuals. The operation planned in other areas of Libya, always on the frontiers so usefully secured by the "revolutions" in Tunisia and Egypt, failed miserably, the only focus outside the homeland of the Islamist fanatics being Misrata.
And why is NATO so worried about keeping the sea connection open to Misrata? To help the "civilians"? Or to supply the "terrorists"?
Does NATO know that the leader of the Islamist terrorists it calls "civilians" was arrested in Pakistan? Was he arrested for stealing strawberries? Why no, he was arrested for belonging to Al-Qaeda and for fighting against...American and British troops. He was shipped back to Libya where he was imprisoned (Muammar Al-Qathafi was the first leader to outlaw Al-Qaeda).
The "rebels" do not like Muammar Al-Qathafi because he called the Moslem veil a "tent", because he had a confrontation with Islamist elders on TV (they could not answer his questions), because he has stated Islamism is not the way forward. And for the reasons mentioned above.
Fast forward to the rebellion. The "rebellion", sorry. Islamist fundamentalists in Benghazi (heard the "allahu akhbar" chants?). Fast forward to the immediate recognition of these terrorists as being the only legitimate Government of Libya by France...and Portugal. And where is the oil? Ah, in Eastern Libya.
And now they accuse "Gaddafy" of using cluster bombs. Interesting, when the USA, UK and France are trying to convince other NATO countries to intervene. Another lie? After all, even if the Libyan authorities were using cluster bombs (which they deny), Libya, like the USA, has not banned this type of weaponry, which was deployed by NATO in Iraq, and so what?
When Islamist fundamentalists start appearing, something happens. In London, the police even murdered a Brazilian (Jean Charles de Menezes) because he "looked Asian". So? Would YOU buy a second-hand wristwatch from Messrs. Cameron, Sarkozy and Obama?
They represent the war lobby gravitating around the White House, which Hillary Clinton's husband turned into the Whore House. They are, in a word, LIARS. Muammar Al-Qathafi, please finish off their terrorists and tear up the contracts you made with their oil companies. Russia, China, India, Brazil, South Africa and the African continent are your oyster. Leave the sickening and revolting murderous war criminals Cameron, Sarkozy and Obama to the fate they deserve.
An objective analysis of where the United Kingdom and its Prime Minister stand one hundred days before the Brexit deadline. Let us see the facts, not conjecture