In light of the rising price of oil and the highest gasoline prices in the United States ever seen, I notice that the left in America criticizes the President, the Vice-President, and so-called "big oil" for inflation of energy costs. However, I wonder if those who "cast the first stone" have considered this:
Isn't it funny how when gas prices were low, the liberals wanted to tax it to "reduce consumption" and "help the environment," forcing Americans into economy fuel-efficient cars (that very few in America seem to want)? The proposed taxes by the left would have raised gasoline prices to $2.00 per gallon and were wholeheartedly supported by John Kerry, Al Gore, and others to achieve these "noble" environmental goals.
Now that gasoline prices ARE $2.00 a gallon, the same liberal minds want to lower gasoline prices because energy at these prices hurt "ordinary people," "families with children," and "working families" (as opposed apparently to "non-working, extraordinary families" like the Heinz-Kerrys?).
These same hypocritical elitists now want us "ordinary people" to be able to buy MORE gallons of gasoline for our $2.00... and it's all Bush's fault...
Putin's official spokesman Dmitry Peskov commented on remarks in the US media about failures in launching nuclear-capable missiles in Russia
The Buk system that shot down MH17 belonged to the 53rd SAM missile brigade of the Russian Ministry of Defense, investigators say after looking at a few pictures on the net
It has long been understood that the West has been trying to subject Russian borders to total control. We have not seen such activity even during the Cold War