Dear Mr. Court,
In your response to Bancroft-Hinchey’s article, The Globalization of Terror , you may shout out that it lacks “FACTS”, yet your response lacks “facts”, uses Saddam in a straw man argument, makes a “sweeping claim” regarding "emotion" (a false argument in an ad hominem attack). Where is the “thoughtfulness”? Could it be that your emotions determined and projected the response, not reason? As it stands the response appears as hypocrisy: as in " Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote in thy brother's eye."