Dear Mr. Court,
In your response to Bancroft-Hinchey’s article, The Globalization of Terror , you may shout out that it lacks “FACTS”, yet your response lacks “facts”, uses Saddam in a straw man argument, makes a “sweeping claim” regarding "emotion" (a false argument in an ad hominem attack). Where is the “thoughtfulness”? Could it be that your emotions determined and projected the response, not reason? As it stands the response appears as hypocrisy: as in " Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote in thy brother's eye."
The Russian Defence Ministry acknowledged that the Americans treat Russian military men in Syria with respect. The Americans always warn Russia accordingly, but not Israel
After the incident with the shootdown of the Ilyushin Il-20 reconnaissance aircraft over the Mediterranean Sea, Russia will supply an S-300 anti-aircraft missile system to Syria
Indeed, how dare they run US-independent policy? They should have followed the example of the European Union that turned independent states of the Old World into US-ditto entities